Dolby Atmos is an object-based immersive audio format that places sounds in three-dimensional space, allowing them to move freely around the listener across speakers or headphones.

Unlike traditional stereo or surround sound, Dolby Atmos does not assign sound to fixed speaker channels. Instead, it treats sounds as independent “objects” with spatial metadata, enabling adaptive playback across cinemas, home theaters, and binaural headphone systems.

Introduction: Why Dolby Atmos Matters Technically, Artistically, and Economically

Dolby Atmos has become a dominant term in music streaming, film sound, gaming, consumer electronics, and music production education. Its rapid adoption reflects not only technological innovation, but also strategic incentives across the music, technology, and hardware industries.

Streaming platforms such as Apple Music promote Dolby Atmos as a competitive differentiator, reinforcing ecosystem loyalty and premium branding. Record labels benefit by remixing and re-monetizing legacy catalogues, creating new commercial value from existing recordings. Hardware manufacturers gain incentives for consumer upgrade cycles, while Dolby expands licensing influence and technical standard control.

This raises a critical question: Is Dolby Atmos primarily a technological advancement, a creative tool, or a market-driven format innovation? This article explores how Dolby Atmos works, how it compares to immersive audio alternatives, and why it matters for music producers, students, and audio professionals.

1. From Mono to Dolby Atmos: The Evolution of Spatial Audio

Audio reproduction has evolved in parallel with research into psychoacoustics—the study of how humans perceive sound.

Key historical milestones:

• Mono: Single-channel sound with no spatial separation
• Stereo: Left-right imaging using interaural time differences (ITD) and interaural level differences (ILD)
• Surround sound (5.1 / 7.1): Multi-speaker spatial immersion
• Dolby Atmos: Object-based, three-dimensional spatial audio

Earlier formats relied on channel-based mixing, meaning sounds were locked to fixed speaker outputs. Dolby Atmos replaces this limitation by allowing position-based sound design, decoupling creative intent from playback system constraints.

2. What Dolby Atmos Actually Is (Technical Overview)

Dolby Atmos is an object-based audio format that stores sound along with metadata describing its position and movement in 3D space.

Each Atmos audio object contains:

• A sound signal
• Spatial coordinates (horizontal, vertical, depth)
• Motion and automation data

During playback, a Dolby Atmos renderer calculates how to distribute these objects across available speakers or headphones, adapting dynamically to the listener’s setup.

Key technical advantages:

• Speaker-layout-agnostic playback
• Scalable from cinema to mobile devices
• Flexible creative control over spatial movement

3. How Dolby Atmos Works in Practice (Mixing and Playback)

Object-Based Mixing in DAWs

In Atmos-enabled workstations such as Pro Tools or Logic Pro, producers can place sounds anywhere in a virtual three-dimensional field. Unlike stereo panning, Atmos enables vertical sound placement, allowing sonic elements to appear above or behind the listener.

Beds vs Objects

Atmos mixes typically contain:

• Beds (channel-based ambience or foundations)
• Objects (individually positioned sound sources)

Beds maintain structural coherence, while objects provide spatial expressiveness.

Psychoacoustics and HRTFs

When listening on headphones, Atmos relies on binaural rendering using head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). These filters simulate how sound interacts with the listener’s head and ears, enabling perception of height, distance, and movement.

4. Dolby Atmos and Musical Creativity

Dolby Atmos reshapes how music can be composed, arranged, and mixed.

New creative possibilities include:

• Vertical layering of instruments
• Spatial call-and-response patterns
• Moving textures as compositional elements
• Architectural simulation through reverb placement

Rather than functioning as a novelty effect, Atmos can serve as a structural and expressive musical dimension, expanding traditional stereo aesthetics.

5. Dolby Atmos vs Immersive Audio vs Ambisonics

The terms immersive audio and 3D audio are often used broadly. Dolby Atmos represents only one of several spatial audio paradigms.

Key Differences Explained

Ambisonics encodes a full sound scene mathematically, while Dolby Atmos focuses on individual movable sound objects.

6. Why Apple and the Music Industry Are Promoting Dolby Atmos

Apple’s Strategy

Apple uses Dolby Atmos and Spatial Audio to:

• Differentiate Apple Music
• Promote proprietary hardware (AirPods, iPhones, Macs)
• Strengthen platform ecosystem lock-in

Record Labels and Catalogue Monetization

Labels leverage Atmos to:

• Remix classic albums
• Repackage old content as premium
• Generate new revenue without new recordings

Dolby’s Market Position

Dolby benefits through:

• Licensing fees
• Control over technical standards
• Long-term influence on audio infrastructure

Hardware Manufacturers

Immersive audio stimulates consumer hardware upgrades, reinforcing cyclical purchasing behavior.

7. Dolby Atmos: Innovation or Marketing? A Critical Perspective

Dolby Atmos exists at the intersection of technological progress and commercial narrative.

Genuine Innovations:

• Flexible object-based mixing
• Expanded spatial composition
• Improved cinematic realism

Critical Observations:

• Many Atmos music releases offer minimal artistic improvement
• Playback quality varies widely across consumer devices
• Marketing often exceeds practical necessity

From an academic standpoint, Atmos can be understood as both:

• A meaningful technological development
• A constructed value proposition shaped by platform economics

8. Why Binaural Audio Drives Mass Adoption

Most consumers listen via headphones, making binaural Dolby Atmos essential for mainstream adoption.

Binaural audio uses psychoacoustic filtering to simulate spatial hearing, allowing immersive experiences without multi-speaker systems.

For students, binaural monitoring provides:

• Affordable access to spatial production
• Practical training in psychoacoustics
• Immediate perceptual feedback

9. How Students Can Practice Dolby Atmos in Home Studios

Listening Exercises

• Compare stereo vs Atmos mixes
• Identify spatial movement and depth
• Analyze spatial arrangement as musical structure

Production Exercises

• Start with static object placement
• Use space as a compositional parameter
• Evaluate whether spatialization supports artistic intent

Learning Atmos strengthens transferable skills in:

• Frequency balance
• Dynamic control
• Critical listening
• Spatial reasoning

10. Why Dolby Atmos Matters for Music Production Education

Studying Dolby Atmos trains students to think of sound as a spatial material, not merely a waveform.

It prepares learners for careers in:

• Music production
• Film and post-production
• Game audio
• Virtual reality
• Sound art and interactive media

More importantly, it cultivates critical technological literacy, enabling students to evaluate emerging formats beyond marketing claims.

Conclusion: Dolby Atmos as a Format, Binaural as the Gateway

Dolby Atmos represents both a creative expansion and a strategic industry development. While commercial forces drive its adoption, it also offers meaningful artistic and educational potential.

Three Key Takeaways

1. Dolby Atmos is an object-based immersive audio format adaptable to many playback systems.
2. Its rise reflects both real innovation and platform-driven marketing strategy.
3. Binaural playback makes immersive audio accessible for students and everyday listeners.

FAQ Section (Optimized for Google Featured Snippets)

What is Dolby Atmos in simple terms?

Dolby Atmos is a sound format that lets audio move around you in three dimensions, including above and behind you.

Is Dolby Atmos better than stereo?

Dolby Atmos offers greater spatial realism, but its benefits depend on playback system quality and artistic use.

Do you need special headphones for Dolby Atmos?

No, but headphones that support Spatial Audio can improve immersion through binaural rendering.

Is Dolby Atmos useful for music producers?

Yes. It expands creative spatial control and prepares producers for modern immersive workflows.

What is the difference between Dolby Atmos and ambisonics?

Dolby Atmos is object-based, while ambisonics encodes an entire soundfield and decodes it later.

The post What Is Dolby Atmos? A Complete Guide to Immersive Audio for Music Production appeared first on Berlin School of Sound.

Should AI Be Making Your Mixing Decisions?

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming music production and audio engineering. Tools based on machine learning are now used for composition, sound design, mixing, and mastering. Among these applications, AI tools for mixing have sparked particularly intense discussion—especially in educational contexts.

For aspiring audio engineers, producers, and technically curious musicians, an important question arises:

Do AI mixing tools support learning and creative decision-making, or do they risk replacing essential engineering skills?

This article examines different approaches to AI-based mixing tools, explains their technical foundations, and evaluates their strengths and limitations. A special focus is placed on why transparent, assistive AI plugins are generally more suitable for education than opaque, one-knob systems.

1. What Are AI Tools for Mixing?

In audio engineering, AI mixing tools are software plugins that use machine learning algorithms to analyze audio signals and propose or apply processing decisions. These decisions may include:

• Equalization (EQ): shaping the frequency balance
• Compression: controlling dynamic range
• Level balancing between tracks
• Stereo placement and spatial effects

Unlike traditional plugins, AI-based tools are trained on large datasets of professionally mixed music. By identifying patterns in these mixes, the system learns what is statistically common or “typical” for certain instruments, genres, or roles within a mix.

It is important to note that AI does not “hear” music emotionally. It processes numerical representations of sound and makes probabilistic decisions based on learned data.

2. Traditional Mixing and Its Theoretical Foundations

Before evaluating AI tools, we must understand what they are augmenting.

Signal Processing

Signal processing refers to the mathematical manipulation of audio signals. Core mixing tools—EQs, compressors, limiters—are all signal processors. For example:

• An EQ modifies amplitude across frequency bands.
• A compressor reduces dynamic range by attenuating signals above a threshold.

Psychoacoustics

Psychoacoustics is the study of how humans perceive sound. Mixing decisions are strongly influenced by perceptual factors such as:

• Frequency sensitivity of the human ear
• Loudness perception
• Spatial hearing and localization

Traditional mixing relies on the engineer’s ability to connect technical tools with perceptual outcomes.

3. AI-Assisted Mixing: Two Fundamental Approaches

AI mixing tools generally fall into two categories:

1. Transparent, assistive AI tools
2. Opaque, one-knob or fully automated systems

This distinction is crucial for both learning outcomes and professional practice.

4. Transparent AI Mixing Tools: Assisted Learning and Control

Definition

Transparent AI plugins analyze audio material and provide clearly visible mix suggestions. The user can inspect, adjust, and override all parameters.

Typical characteristics include:

• Displayed EQ curves
• Visible compression thresholds and ratios
• Adjustable gain, attack, and release times

The AI acts as a decision-support system rather than an autonomous mixer.

Educational and Practical Advantages

1. Strong Learning Value

For audio engineering students, transparency enables direct links between theory and practice. When an AI suggests reducing low-mid frequencies on a piano track, students can relate this to frequency masking, where overlapping frequencies reduce clarity.

2. Preservation of Creative Intent

Transparent tools allow engineers to modify or reject suggestions. This is essential when working with stylistic goals that deviate from mainstream reference mixes.

3. Development of Critical Listening

By comparing AI proposals with personal listening impressions, students train their auditory judgment—an essential skill in professional audio engineering.

Practical Exercise for Students

In a home studio or classroom setting:

1. Insert a transparent AI mixing plugin on a vocal track.
2. Observe the suggested EQ and compression settings.
3. Disable the plugin and recreate the processing manually.

This reinforces both listening skills and technical understanding.

5. Opaque AI Mixing Tools: One-Knob Convenience

Definition

Opaque AI tools hide internal processing from the user. They often feature:

• A single control knob (e.g. “Amount” or “Style”)
• Fully automatic signal chains

These plugins function as black boxes: the user hears the result but cannot see or modify the process.

Advantages

• Fast results for rough mixes or demos
• Accessible for users without technical background
• Minimal setup time

Limitations for Education and Professional Work

1. Reduced Understanding

Without insight into processing decisions, students cannot connect results to signal processing principles.

2. Limited Problem-Solving

If a mix sounds incorrect, the lack of parameter access makes troubleshooting difficult.

3. Aesthetic Standardization

One-knob systems tend to produce similar sonic results, which may reduce artistic individuality.

6. Why Transparency Matters in Audio Engineering Education

In structured audio engineering programs, the goal is not only a good-sounding mix, but repeatable understanding.

Transparent AI tools:

• Support analytical thinking
• Encourage experimentation
• Allow conscious rule-breaking

Opaque systems, by contrast, prioritize outcome over process—problematic in learning environments.

7. AI, Psychoacoustics, and Human Judgment

AI systems are typically trained on mixes that follow established psychoacoustic norms. However, human engineers consider:

• Musical context
• Emotional intention
• Cultural and genre-specific aesthetics

Transparent AI tools allow these human factors to remain central, while opaque systems often enforce implicit norms.

8. Practical Advice for Aspiring Audio Engineers

Students interested in AI mixing tools should:

• Use AI suggestions as starting points, not final decisions
• Prefer plugins that visualize processing
• Regularly bypass AI processing for comparison
• Maintain manual mixing practice alongside AI-assisted workflows

This balanced approach ensures both efficiency and long-term skill development.

Conclusion: Three Key Takeaways

AI tools are now firmly embedded in modern music production, but their design philosophy matters—especially in education.

Key takeaways:

1. Transparent AI mixing tools enhance learning by making signal processing decisions visible and adjustable.
2. One-knob AI systems favor speed over understanding, limiting educational depth.
3. Effective audio engineering combines human judgment with AI assistance, not full automation.

For students and future professionals, understanding why a mix works remains more valuable than achieving quick results.

Learn Professional Mixing at Berlin School of Sound

Want to master both traditional mixing and modern AI-assisted workflows?

Our Studio Engineering: Recording & Mixing Course offers hands-on training with:

• Professional studio equipment (€10,000+ worth)
• Expert instruction from Henning Grambow
• Both manual and AI-assisted mixing techniques
• Small groups (maximum 5 students)
• 32 hours of intensive practice

Additionally, students learn to use transparent AI mixing tools as educational aids while developing fundamental engineering skills.

Interested in sound design and production? Check out our Make Some Waves semester program for comprehensive audio education.

The post AI Tools for Mixing: Transparent Assistance vs. One-Knob Automation in 2026 appeared first on Berlin School of Sound.

Sound art is a form of artistic expression where sound serves as the primary medium. While it might seem similar to music at first glance, sound art differs fundamentally in its intention and conceptual framework. Where music typically employs rhythm, melody, and harmony, sound art focuses on the experience of sound itself—inviting us to reconsider our relationship with the acoustic environment and encouraging active listening rather than passive hearing.

What Is Sound Art?

Sound art is an artistic discipline that explores sound more broadly than traditional music. Instead of centering on melody, harmony, and rhythm, it examines sound’s qualities, sources, context, and how listeners experience it.

This practice encompasses diverse approaches, from abstract sonic compositions to site-specific installations created for galleries, museums, public spaces, and digital platforms. Sound artists frequently challenge conventional listening habits and invite audiences to experience sound in fresh, unexpected ways.

The fundamental distinction between sound art and music lies in intention and presentation. Music generally aims to create aesthetic pleasure through organized sound, while sound art often prioritizes conceptual exploration, spatial experience, and the relationships between sound, environment, perception, and meaning. It can reveal ordinarily ignored sounds in daily life or make familiar sounds seem strange by placing them in new contexts.

Sound art also raises profound questions about authorship and collaboration. Many sound artists work directly with communities, incorporating voices, stories, and environmental recordings that belong to specific groups or locations. This collaborative dimension distinguishes sound art from traditional composition, where a single author typically controls all creative decisions. By sharing creative authority or documenting collective experiences, sound artists acknowledge that soundscapes are shaped by multiple forces—social, political, natural, and technological.

Historical Development

The origins of sound art trace back to the early 20th century, when composers and avant-garde artists began questioning the rigid boundaries between music and noise. A pivotal moment arrived in 1913 when Italian Futurist Luigi Russolo published his influential manifesto, The Art of Noises, arguing passionately that industrial sounds and machines deserved integration into artistic practice.

Significant experimental developments occurred during the mid-20th century. Composers working with musique concrète, particularly Pierre Schaeffer, began manipulating recorded sounds using early tape technology in the 1940s. This radical approach treated recorded sound not merely as documentation but as raw material to be shaped, composed, and transformed.

John Cage became essential in expanding the definitions of both music and sound art. His controversial composition 4’33” (1952) challenged audiences to reconsider the nature of sound and silence—the performer remains silent throughout, deliberately focusing attention on ambient environmental sounds naturally filling the space. Cage’s work fundamentally questioned what art and music could encompass.

During the 1960s and 1970s, artists increasingly integrated sound into visual art environments. The Fluxus movement championed these interdisciplinary approaches, while sound sculpture emerged as a distinct medium. Max Neuhaus pioneered sound installations, creating site-specific works that transformed public spaces through carefully crafted acoustic interventions.

The introduction of electronic music studios, synthesizers, and later personal computers dramatically expanded the creative tools available. This technological evolution continues shaping the field today, with contemporary sound artists working with techniques ranging from analog tape loops to advanced digital programming.

The democratization of technology in recent decades has transformed who can participate in sound art. Affordable recording devices, free software, and online distribution platforms have lowered barriers to entry, enabling artists from diverse backgrounds and geographic locations to contribute to the field. This accessibility has enriched sound art with perspectives previously underrepresented in institutional contexts, bringing attention to marginalized soundscapes and listening practices that challenge Western-centric definitions of art and music.

Categories and Approaches

Sound art encompasses a wide range of creative methods and forms:

Sound-based Composition involves artists utilizing tones, noise, or field recordings to explore fundamental characteristics of sound—its texture, movement, and essence. These works might be abstract or atmospheric, often highlighting qualities like resonance, vibration, or duration.

Sound Installation creates artworks specifically for physical spaces such as galleries, public sites, or architectural environments. In these works, sound becomes a dynamic component of the space itself, interacting with materials, surfaces, and audience movements.

Interactive and Technological Sound Art employs digital tools, sensors, robotics, or custom software to create systems where sound responds to audience actions. This approach transforms listeners from passive observers into active participants.

Site-Specific Sound Art designs works for one specific indoor or outdoor location that cannot be easily relocated without losing meaning. Artists often engage directly with the existing soundscape—whether wind, traffic, water, or human activity—making the location integral to the work.

Found Sounds and Everyday Noise involves using recordings of everyday sounds or recontextualizing them to highlight their musical, rhythmic, or emotional qualities. This approach questions conventional notions of what constitutes “artistic” or “musical” sound.

Sound Sculpture employs physical objects that generate, amplify, or modify sound, existing between visual art and sound art. Examples include outdoor works activated by wind and kinetic pieces featuring motors and resonant materials. Artists construct specialized instruments or sound objects triggered by nature, human interaction, or automated systems.

Field Recording captures environmental sounds that can be presented as-is or incorporated into composed works. This method often carries documentary or ethnographic significance, preserving soundscapes representing specific places, times, or communities. Artists like Hildegard Westerkamp have developed sophisticated techniques for transforming field recordings into rich sonic narratives. This practice also raises questions of representation, listening ethics, and the politics of recording in unfamiliar communities.

Phonography—sound recording as artistic practice—has developed its own aesthetic and discourse. Artists working with field recordings make decisions about context, editing, and presentation. Some share recordings with minimal intervention, while others heavily edit and reshape source material. Online platforms and specialized labels have built communities where artists exchange work and develop shared aesthetic principles.

Performance-based Sound Art consists of live works where artists generate or manipulate sound in real-time. This includes experimental music performances, sound actions, and interventions that blur boundaries between music, performance, and theater. The ephemeral nature emphasizes presence, process, and the unique conditions of each presentation.

Radio Art and Transmission Works utilize broadcasting technologies as artistic media, creating pieces specifically for radio transmission or exploring electromagnetic phenomena creatively. This tradition extends from early experimental radio pieces to contemporary investigations of wireless communication and broadcast infrastructure. These works often invite listeners to experience sound and technology in unexpected ways.

Multimedia Practices frequently combine sound with other forms—visual art, performance, text, or digital media—to create rich, immersive sensory experiences that engage multiple senses simultaneously.

Conceptual Foundations

Several key concepts shape how sound art is created and experienced:

Listening as Active Practice — Sound art often demands close listening rather than casual hearing. Artists employ techniques that help audiences notice usually ignored sounds or hear familiar sounds differently. This attentive listening transforms hearing from passive reception into active engagement. Composer Pauline Oliveros introduced “deep listening,” a practice of listening with complete attention that involves noticing not only sounds themselves but also silences, spaces between sounds, and how the body experiences sound.

Site-Specificity — Many sound works depend fundamentally on their location. Artists consider architectural acoustics, environmental sounds, social context, or site history. Works often change significantly if relocated. Site-specific pieces might enhance natural sounds, introduce new sounds that interact with the environment, or alter how people navigate and experience space.

Temporality — Sound unfolds over time, unlike visual art which exists in space. Sound artists work with duration, rhythm, repetition, and transformation. Pieces can last seconds or extend for hours, days, or years. Temporal structure affects how audiences maintain attention, form memories, and comprehend sonic sequences.

Spatiality — Sound radiates in all directions, and artists use space to shape perception. They can control directionality, distance, reverberation, and movement to create specific effects. Multi-speaker configurations can make sound travel around spaces or emanate from particular points. Understanding how sound reflects, diffracts, and interferes in space is crucial for installation work.

Materiality — While sound itself is invisible, sound art often emphasizes the physical sources that generate or modify it, including instruments, objects, the human body, architecture, and technology. Artists may foreground sound’s physical origins, revealing processes of production or transmission.

Technical Considerations for Beginners

Understanding basic technical concepts enhances both creation and appreciation of sound art. Knowledge of sound behaviour and management provides greater control and enables more interesting, engaging work.

Recording Technologies — Digital tools have made capturing and manipulating sounds more accessible. Learning about microphone types, placement techniques, and recording environment effects is important for quality results. Dynamic microphones are robust and suited for loud sources, condenser microphones are sensitive and capture detail, and contact microphones pick up vibrations directly from surfaces. Recording proximity—close to the source or at distance—affects sonic character. Experimenting with these techniques helps develop desired sounds.

Playback and Spatialization — Playback significantly impacts listener experience. Even simple stereo speakers can create spatial depth, while multi-speaker setups enable sound movement and directionality. Understanding speaker placement, room acoustics, and how surfaces affect sound is crucial for immersive experiences. Sound’s interaction with space can completely transform perception.

Processing and Manipulation — Digital audio workstations (DAWs) enable sound editing, processing, and transformation in numerous ways. You can filter frequencies, time-stretch sounds, layer multiple sounds, or apply effects to create textures and atmospheres. Learning these techniques opens creative possibilities impossible or difficult to achieve with acoustic instruments alone. Experimenting with sound processing helps develop unique styles and discover new sonic possibilities.

Acoustic Principles — Though sound feels invisible, understanding its behavior helps artists make informed choices. Basic concepts include pitch (frequency), loudness (amplitude), resonance (natural amplification), reverberation (spatial echoes), and diffraction (sound bending around objects). Understanding these principles helps predict room behavior, achieve clear recordings, and create interesting interactions between sounds and space.

Tips for Beginners — Start simply and experiment frequently. Try recording everyday sounds, listen carefully to how they change across different spaces, and explore basic processing techniques. Notice how different microphones capture sound and how speaker placement affects experience. Most importantly, trust your ears—learning sound art involves listening, experimenting, and discovering what works for you.

Engaging with Sound Art

For those beginning to explore sound art, several approaches facilitate deeper engagement:

Visit sound installations with sufficient time to fully experience the work. Unlike visual art, which can be apprehended relatively quickly, sound works require sustained attention and often reveal themselves gradually. Allow time for initial orientation, then focus on specific sonic elements, spatial relationships, and your own perceptual responses.

Develop critical listening skills through regular practice. This might involve focused attention to everyday soundscapes, comparing different recordings or sound systems, or analyzing how sound functions across various media.

Explore documentation and recordings of sound works while recognizing their limitations. Recordings cannot fully capture spatial, architectural, or durational aspects of installations, but they provide access to otherwise ephemeral works and historical pieces.

Attend live sound performances and experimental music concerts to experience the immediacy and unpredictability of sound art in action. Live events offer opportunities to witness artists’ creative processes, observe how they manipulate equipment and materials in real-time, and experience the collective energy of an audience engaged in active listening together.

Connect with local sound art communities through workshops, listening groups, or online forums. Many cities host regular sound art gatherings where practitioners share work, discuss techniques, and collaborate on projects. These communities provide supportive environments for learning, experimentation, and constructive feedback that can accelerate your development as both creator and listener.

Conclusion

Sound art represents a vital contemporary artistic practice that expands definitions of both art and music. Its interdisciplinary nature creates rich opportunities for creative exploration and critical engagement, offering accessible entry points while supporting sophisticated conceptual and technical development. Whether you’re listening in a gallery, recording sounds in your neighborhood, or experimenting with digital tools, sound art invites you to hear the world differently. As you engage more deeply with this practice, you’ll discover that sound art is not merely about creating interesting noises or novel listening experiences—it’s about cultivating a more attentive, curious, and critical relationship with the sonic dimensions of existence, transforming how you perceive and navigate the acoustic environments that surround you every day.

The post Sound Art: A Complete Beginner’s Guide appeared first on Berlin School of Sound.